Guildford Liberal Democrats are campaigning all year round for local residents

22% rise in councillors' allowances 'unacceptable' say Lib Dems

9.00.00am GMT Wed 12th Dec 2007

Conservative borough councillors pushed through a 22% rise in councillors' allowances at last week's meeting of full Council, in spite of Liberal Democrat objections that such a large increase was unacceptable to council-tax payers, and that service cuts might be needed to pay for it.

Proposing that councillors' allowances should remain unchanged, and be merely indexed in line with council officers' salary increases, Cllr Liz Hogger (Lib Dem, Effingham) said "The increase in allowances proposed by the Executive amounts to some £50,000 more than the current scheme - that's not far off a 1% increase in council tax. We know that to keep the council tax increase down to 5% the council needs to cut nearly £½ million off its expenditure next year. So what council services will be cut to pay for this huge increases in councillors' allowances? In these circumstances, to give ourselves such a large increase is quite unacceptable."

Cllr Sarah Di Caprio (Lib Dem, Holy Trinity) added "No one becomes a councillor for financial reward. In the current tight financial circumstances of local government, it would be quite wrong for us to give ourselves such a large pay-rise."

However Conservative councillors rejected the Liberal Democrat amendment, and voted through the 22% increase from April next year.

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Previous news story: Civic costs should not eat up housing money, say Lib Dems (Mon 10th Dec 2007).
Next news story: Nick Clegg MP elected Liberal Democrat Leader (Tue 18th Dec 2007).

Related News Stories:

Wed 20th Feb 2008:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Guildford Liberal Democrats, The Hall, 53a Woking Road, Guildford, Surrey GU1 1QD.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.